Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Details About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

This can be designed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It really is the muse for numerous pet loads, however I have not been content with the outcomes.

Ballistically, Hodgdon H4831 SC Powder is the exact duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain measurement, hence, the designation SC or short Slice. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to flow through the powder steps additional efficiently, assisting to ease the continuous cutting of granules.

This is probably the most significant motives reloaders are admonished to employ new data only; and to begin minimal anytime you receive a whole new large amount of powder. You don't really know (Except the corporate lets you know so) that the new lots of powder was even created at precisely the same manufacturing facility given that the powder you purchased a number of years in the past.

I have experienced several rifles that fouled really lousy. Finding every one of the copper out was a real PIA right until I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

INgunner54 said: It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams.

Due to the fact there doesn't seem like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can some of you supply a starting point with this mix and matters to consider when Operating this Load up?

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very restricted supply of Varget, and a large amount extra readily available H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, since that's just what the rifles shoot the ideal.

Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a attempt to reduce a number of the compression. What a miscalculation, I couldn't get this powder to shoot correctly or develop the velocities I get with normal 7828.

With the smoother move features will come a lot more uniform charge weights, though the individual grains orient a lot more compactly, producing much better loading density.

In addition, it goes on to express that due to the fshorter grains, that load density could be somewhat greater.

I've experienced related working experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will not shoot perfectly h4831sc load data with something apart from Fed215's. Some components just Do not Engage in effectively with other. Looks like you've got preferred 3 great powders, I would hope not less than one of them to shoot.

It can be possible that no additional discussion is required, during which situation we advocate starting off a fresh thread. If even so you are feeling your reaction is needed it is possible to even now do this.

Southwest Idaho I attempted H4831sc in my three hundred WM but had much better speed and accuracy with H1000. I'd relatively make use of a slower burning powder with 215g supplements.

This seems like a superb place to divulge somewhat more info on Hodgdon, H4831 exclusively...I once had h4831 vs h4831sc a pound of H4831SC sit to the shelf for numerous several years. It absolutely was bought in advance of Hodgdon commenced publicizing the "Severe" line of powders, of which h4831sc load data the H4831s are a component.